<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aurlog &#187; newsnight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aurochs.org/aurlog/tags/newsnight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aurochs.org/aurlog</link>
	<description>Cows and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 22:41:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CILIP (not) on Newsnight</title>
		<link>http://www.aurochs.org/aurlog/2010/06/11/cilip-not-on-newsnight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aurochs.org/aurlog/2010/06/11/cilip-not-on-newsnight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Orangeaurochs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cilip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsnight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aurochs.org/aurlog/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I understand that CILIP was actually offered a chance to talk on Newsnight the other day. I&#8217;ve always been of the opinion that CILIP should make more effort to push itself into the media, to publicise and stand-up for the profession. The other day the BBC actually asked CILIP onto a programme, and a significant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that CILIP was actually offered a chance to talk on Newsnight the other day. I&#8217;ve always been of the opinion that CILIP should make more effort to push itself into the media, to publicise and stand-up for the profession. The other day the BBC actually asked CILIP onto a programme, and a significant and highly influential one at that, and they didn&#8217;t have anyone available. I expect there are real and genuine reasons why there wasn&#8217;t anyone- apparently there were people willing to speak by phone or video link- but I think the fact that CILIP was not prepared for such an occasion, even when libraries were unusually in the news that day, is very symbolic of CILIP&#8217;s attitude and institutional inability to promote the profession and to deal with modern media. This is especially surprising given all the recent soul-searching within CILIP and the recognised urgent need for the library profession to defend itself as it&#8217;s a soft target in any upcoming cuts. Any robust response to the now infamous <a href="http://rd.kpmg.co.uk/docs/KPMG_PFS_June2010.pdf">KPMG report</a> (see p. 19) seems to have consisted of unofficial bloggers (<a href="http://bethaninfoprof.wordpress.com/2010/06/08/could-we-all-be-replaced-by-volunteers/">e.g.</a>) and bloggers from CILIP Update (<a href="http://communities.cilip.org.uk/blogs/update/archive/2010/06/08/alan-downie-s-is-the-voice-of-elitism-but-librarians-have-failed-to-champion-the-underprivileged.aspx">e.g.</a>), all largely preaching to the choir. I hope they were also pushing a press release down the BBC&#8217;s throat, although I haven&#8217;t heard of one.</p>
<p>Update:  I should point out that, according to the <a href="http://thewikiman.org/blog/?p=764">thewikiman</a>,  CILIP apparently asked to be on Newsnight in the first place:</p>
<blockquote><p>I now understand that in fact CILIP contacted Newsnight in the first place – although they ultimately couldn’t make it happen. For me, even though the end result is the same, there’s a huge difference between those two scenarios – in one, CILIP is shirking a fabulous opportunity, but in the other (in actuality) they were tryng to MAKE an opportunity offf their own proactiveness… Which is great. Shame, obviously, that it didn’t work out, and I stand by the idea that hevean and earth should be moved in such a scenario, but the most important thing to take from this new understanding of the events is that it shows CILIP is already moving in the right direction.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have to agree with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aurochs.org/aurlog/2010/06/11/cilip-not-on-newsnight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

